[GloriaJane]

"Cain backed out of a Union Leader interview because the paper insisted on a 60-minute, on-camera sit-down, as opposed to the 20-minute, camera-free conversation Cain hoped for."

"Cain’s spokesman “called me up this morning and wondered if they could come in one day next week for an hour-long interview and have C-SPAN there.”

So who was supposed to be recording the interview before Mr. Cain backed out? Anyone know?

Was it C-SPAN?

If not, then maybe that's why Mr. Cain would first turn down an hour long on camera interview, and then call back asking for one to be on C-SPAN. Because with C-SPAN, you would think it wouldn't be cut, snipped, and edited to trash Mr. Cain.

[monkapotamus]

"So who was supposed to be recording the interview before Mr. Cain backed out? Anyone know?"

C-SPAN.

[CharlesWayneCT]

The video for this interview, which all the candidates are doing, was for C-SPAN. I don’t know if C-SPAN was DOING the taping before.

It was a “nice, but pathetic, try” by his campaign to word the “request” to make it sound like Cain was the one asking for a longer interview and a C-SPAN broadcast, when that was the original plan he had rejected.

[samantha]

I believe you are correct, if you have a cspan tape,and they (Union)cut their tape to trash HC, he can show the entire cut instead of the selective prostitution of News.

I think some of these HC haters need to get a testosterone implant, they sound like jealous,bitchy schoolgirls. I am waiting for them to try and spit at him and pull his hair while stamping their clodhopper feet.