Smart move? Or no?
If it is an interview for a newspaper, why do they want/need a video tape of it? To get a video they can post on the web if he happens to misspeak or fumble an answer, that’s why.
Try saying this real slow, say, a news paper is not a TV station, you go on TV with Letterman, for example, dang, they have TV cameras there, you go to the newspaper, they have cameras and print. Now real slow , read this, “do you see and understand the difference in a newspaper and a TV station.� If you do not, may be a google search would help.
The Kingmakers at the Union Leader are pitching a fit...they know what is best for America...bow to your northeast overlords.
The paper is correct on this. Cain should have allowed it to be filmed, although I suspect he himself is beginning to realize that he’s not competent to be running and he doesn’t want to reveal it even more than he has already done.
That said, Romney never lets anything be shown about him unless he’s fully in control of it and has even ducked out of a number of these “debates.” Yet no comments on that from any source...
Tough crap. they’re a newspaper, not a TV show. They can use their own fishwrap to cry in if it bothers them. They must not respect their own medium.
There is a concerted game of “gotcha” going on with Cain, so why give them ammo?
They really need a better name for their newspaper.
The headline makes me think that Richie Trumka or Andy Stern blased Cain (which would really not be news)
I guess Cain decided it wasn’t a smart move afterall:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2810525/posts
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68828.html
F—k Newt
F—k Mitt
I swear on my life and the lives of my children, I will NOT vote for either of them in the primary or the general election.
I just F’ing refuse to vote for a GD liberal POS be they DEM or GOP.