[LurkingSince'98]

Z you are hysterically wrong.

Your errors:

“You know that Rossi has Intellectual Property, when he shows you a device that does something,”

I have a device that was first designed in 2004, work has proceeded on and off until today. That is seven years of work and we are still three to six months away from a fully functioning prototype. So are you saying that I cannot claim to have IP because I cannot demonstrate to you a working model? And if my prototype was working do you think I would tell you or anyone else about it?

The amazing and laughable thing is you believe that Rossi is honor bound to demonstrate to “the public” ie little seagull, that his unit operates to little seagull’s satisfaction.

He doesn’t need to prove his claims to you or anyone else in the public domain.

He doesn’t allow it because it would cost him his IP, a point which is evidently lost on you, little seagull.

BTW I never said that I believe Rossi - I did say that you haven’t a clue about IP or how one goes about protecting and maintaining it.

The link was in response to your dis-belief in LENR and that it was not science based. The link was about the science behind LENR and not anything about Rossi’s work.

I forgot that seagull’s can’t read, but have great eyesight so here is a link to the video about the science behind LENR - http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=3B79262131CA1BCF

BTW it has nothing to do with Rossi just LENR.

Lurking’

[ZX12R]

I have a device that was first designed in 2004, work has proceeded on and off until today. That is seven years of work and we are still three to six months away from a fully functioning prototype. So are you saying that I cannot claim to have IP because I cannot demonstrate to you a working model? And if my prototype was working do you think I would tell you or anyone else about it?

It's easy to see why you are attracted to FRingie threads, like a shiny object is attractive to a dullard. Let me guess, the device you're working on, is a cold fusion cell that makes coffee.

Claims of IP are just that, claims. Color me crazy, but I think reasonable people may want verification of a claim, before it joins the ranks of reality. I don't see why that is so difficult for you to understand. You can't patent a claim. I have developed IP which allows the creation of a device that locates the pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. Should I patent it? Do I have IP, or am I just claiming I do?