Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change

hey count,

I design and build proprietary process equipment and would never let “casual” observers in for a “look see” on our processes or equipment.

Anyone who has intellectual property (IP) has to have his head examined if he allows anyone, other than an absolute need to know folks under his factory roof.

His activity is not strange it is just in keeping with good IP practice, and to do otherwise he would certainly loose his proprietary and confidential IP status.

You are obviously unfamiliar with IP or confidential process property or you would not bring it up.

Lurking’


14 posted on 11/21/2011 8:47:15 AM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LurkingSince'98
His activity is not strange it is just in keeping with good IP practice, and to do otherwise he would certainly loose his proprietary and confidential IP status.

It is also not strange for some who has no Intellectual Property, and just a scam. Letting people around would get him found out, and lose his (might just be something to it) status.

Seagulls report, you decide. Squawk.
16 posted on 11/21/2011 8:59:21 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LurkingSince'98
Maybe protection of some secret process or equipment is the motivation but from all the details given only the catalysts is the truly unknown.

Maybe the factories don't exist. Not in fifth floor apartment or a mail drop office certainly. If people are going to be hired to work in these factories I assume they'll have to look at what they're doing.

“You are obviously unfamiliar with IP or confidential process property or you would not bring it up.”

An unwarranted assumption.

Rossi isn't designing something proprietary to the customer. Anyone who purchases his device can tear it down and see exactly what is in it how it was constructed.

“His activity is not strange it is just in keeping with good IP practice, and to do otherwise he would certainly loose his proprietary and confidential IP status.”

Take a tour of a Coca Cola bottler and you still won't know the formula for the syrup.

If Rossi has no factories to tour the whole question is moot.

24 posted on 11/21/2011 9:53:28 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LurkingSince'98

>> “Anyone who has intellectual property (IP) has to have his head examined if he allows anyone, other than an absolute need to know folks under his factory roof.” <<

.
This point has been made before but it just causes the agitprop to increase.


67 posted on 11/22/2011 3:27:44 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson