Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Having Kittens Over E-Cat.
E-Cat World ^ | Nov. 21, 2011 | Frank Acland

Posted on 11/21/2011 7:47:23 AM PST by count-your-change

Acland quotes another cold fusion researcher at the E-Cat World page:

"“In the last 8 weeks I have been astounded by a superior nanotechnology that will capture the imagination of even the greatest foes of LENR. I believe all of LENR is just a new and unanticipated form of nanomagnetism.”

(Excerpt) Read more at ecatnews.net ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coldfusion; ecat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: ZX12R

Wow Z
It’s easy to see why you are attracted to FRingie threads, like a shiny object is attractive to a dullard.

what a smuck you are.

I am an inventor have patents in Biomendical Heart Monitoring Electrodes and and have Licensed Intellectual property on Mercury Remediation processes.

WTF do you have or have you done.

Bite Me

Lurking’


61 posted on 11/22/2011 11:32:49 AM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
what a smuck you are.

That's schmuck, not smuck. If you're going to call me names, be accurate about it. And I know a few people that would agree with you, by the way.

WTF do you have or have you done.

I've been co-author on more than a half dozen REAL peer reviewed and published scientific research papers. But I don't keep count.

My current day job is designing and constructing REAL research apparatus for scientists and other researchers at a major university. A university is a place where REAL research takes place.
62 posted on 11/22/2011 11:50:26 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R

well if you can’t sell it in the real world there is always the academic world - they’ll buy anything.

It is obvious you are completely unfamiliar with Trade Secret and Intellectual Property law, likely do not own, nor license any IP and probably never held a real job in business; otherwise you would not have made a fool of yourself as anyone in the IP world can see in a minute.

Maybe your an academic mushroom (live in the dark and live on hor$e$hit) not a seagull.

Goodbye


63 posted on 11/22/2011 12:21:17 PM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
So Rossi "has his cards on the table, except for his hole cards?" Let's examine his cards, according to your account:

1. SPAWAR has revolutionized physics without physicists' noticing.
2. Rossi has filed an application for a U.S. patent.
3 and higher: [top secret]

Are there any other cards you're counting but didn't mention in your post?
64 posted on 11/22/2011 3:06:18 PM PST by aNYCguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Everything has to start somewhere.

I can reemember when there was no such thing as CMOS. (If obama has his way, we may get there again soon)


65 posted on 11/22/2011 3:18:13 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

The Chinese aren’t that sharp on technology. They can copy something that is already developed, but haven’t come up with anything new on their own.


66 posted on 11/22/2011 3:21:14 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

>> “Anyone who has intellectual property (IP) has to have his head examined if he allows anyone, other than an absolute need to know folks under his factory roof.” <<

.
This point has been made before but it just causes the agitprop to increase.


67 posted on 11/22/2011 3:27:44 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

A thermocouple converts heat into electricity, or the reverse. I have ice chests that do that stuff quite well.


68 posted on 11/22/2011 3:36:56 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

>> “I had no problem tuning in radio staions, without any batteries” <<

.
But, did your crystal radio drive a loudspeaker without batteries?


69 posted on 11/22/2011 3:53:32 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: aNYCguy
hey a...

1) you have obviously not watched any of the SPAWAR videos which cover, in depth, their research in LENR - they are in the public domain and freely available.

2) As for physicists not noticing - that's garbage propaganda - the thirty or so physicists in the room must of noticed otherwise why would they have been there. If you are not present when a tree falls in a forest - does that mean the tree did not fall NO! it only means that you missed it - and you did miss it.

3) I will accept Rossi’s patent application as just what it is, a patent application - and I would give any critic more credence if they just would apply for a LENR patent using a different method, however all the critics do is criticize not shed any new light on LENR.

4) What I didn't mention in my post is the pi$$poor posts from armchair critics who because they have a some small morsel knowledge think they are experts. One guy quoted Sander Olson of nanotech fame as an expert - well it turns out that Sander Olson has his BS and MS in HISTORY, which I am certain qualifies him to pan Rossi and be quoted by every two-bit Rossi critic. Another said Rossi was a quack because Rossi did not have an Export license and restricted armament license. Another that Rossi must show his Intellectual Property for all the world to see, that guy works in academia and his lack of knowledge on IP was painfully obvious.

What a bunch of armchair, Monday morning quarterback, uninformed, dim-bulb losers.

Free-Republic has really degenerated into a forum where anybody without a lick of sense thinks it is his God given right to spew what ever notion pops into his head.

Lurking’

70 posted on 11/22/2011 7:58:00 PM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“They can copy something that is already developed, but haven’t come up with anything new on their own.”

I will second that - a friend who does 3D solid-modelling for Honeywell was let go as they off-shored the entire design department.

He got a call several months later from his old boss and spend the next two years as an independent contractor for Honeywell correcting drawings problems, which came back from China.

Lurking’


71 posted on 11/22/2011 8:02:32 PM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
The is no need for a nuclear license since only SPAWAR has ever documented radiation from LENR and that radiation was stopped by a layer of tin foil. Rossi states that the radiation is transitory and is stopped by a thin layer of lead foil. It logically follows then: no radiation - no need for a radiation license.

Does that mean LENR is what's happening inside the ecat?

72 posted on 11/22/2011 8:16:32 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

hi moon..

I haven’t a clue since I haven’t been inside an e-cat; however, since the LENR, which have been published all seem to have low, very low or immeasurable radiation - it would seem to be a good candidate.

Rossi indicated low radiation, which is easily stopped by the lead shielding covering the e-cat.

I don’t believe anyone can say with certainty except those on the inside of NDAs and obviously they are not talking.

Lurking’


73 posted on 11/22/2011 8:30:35 PM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

LENR seems to rely on “heavy electrons” and the capture of the heavy electron by a proton. In Rossi’s patent application, he mentions fusion, fission, and beta decay, but nothing that could be construed as LENR, if my understanding of LENR is correct.


74 posted on 11/22/2011 8:39:11 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

hi moon..

30% of Ni to Cu transmutation reported in Rossi’s reactor with protons masked as neutrons shown here: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473

and Hydrogen/Nickel cold fusion probable mechanism here: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338&cpage

PS make sure you sign up with Leonardo corp for a 10kw e-cat - 1st 10k in guaranteed at ~ $4,500 US.

Regards
Lurking’


75 posted on 11/22/2011 9:12:48 PM PST by LurkingSince'98 (Catholics=John 6:53-58 Everyone else=John 6:60-66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98
I read the article you linked to here:
and Hydrogen/Nickel cold fusion probable mechanism here: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338&cpage
But it's based on nothing more than intuition. He could have calculated the expected reaction rate, but didn't. I wonder why.
The above considerations are based only on an intuitive approach and I trust this phenomenon could be tackled in a systematic and integrated way through the “theory of time dependent perturbations” by employing the appropriate Hamiltonian, which includes time:

76 posted on 11/22/2011 10:55:02 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: LurkingSince'98

What a bunch of armchair, Monday morning quarterback, uninformed, dim-bulb losers.

Free-Republic has really degenerated into a forum where anybody without a lick of sense thinks it is his God given right to spew what ever notion pops into his head.

***I summed up that sentiment by calling them seagulls, and the mods told me to stop. Apparently seagulls are sensitive about their feelings, doncha know.


77 posted on 11/22/2011 11:42:42 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Awww... the seagull posts are what kept me reading. I didn’t fully understand everything else. ;)


78 posted on 11/22/2011 11:45:37 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
It seemed like innocuous fun to me. Some insults are more fun than others. "
79 posted on 11/22/2011 11:52:06 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
***I summed up that sentiment by calling them seagulls,

I like the seagull moniker. I've grown fond of it. In fact, it's the only interesting part of these prolifically posted threads about magic snake oil devices containing tons and tons of Intellectual property to be protected.

Just my morning squawk.
80 posted on 11/23/2011 4:51:51 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson