“The thread didn’t start with any statement from me, did it?”
Didn’t say it did.
That’s why I included Duffy’s name in the ping as a reference.
The ‘you’ was simply a generic reference to anyone that would begin a thread that way.
But, this is your comment? Correct?
“This is a thread about the hypocrisy of Obama and Co. in seeking reelection. Our focus should be on the frightening aspect of a radical anti-American as POTUS.
That it’s turned into a religious thread shows just how effect Obama is. The circular firing squad is now in session.”
Your interpretation of WHY this thread was started is in stark contrast to the posters opening statement.
This comment BEGS for an argument...
“Obama’s strategy. It seems to be working quite well around here. We Mormons have been called a lot worse than “weird” here. “
NOT dialogue on Obama’s position or strategy..
Sometimes reading past the headline will give you a better understanding of the ‘intent’ of the poster.
I wouldn’t have replied to you had I known just how smart you are.