Replies

BTW: If I were advising any other campaign - I’d say go as hard as possible at the Muslims right now and get in on this.

Well then it's a good thing you're not such an adviser, as such ham-handedness has no place in a Presidential campaign and would earn Mr. Cain the label of "zealous bigot." Yet seeing as you are an advocate for Newt, perhaps this "advice" is intentionally less than might appear.

Mr. Cain needn't attack Islam in any other respect than to point out the prevalent evil of disproportionate government protection of Islam versus its systematic attacks on Judeo-Christianity as an even worse evil. Hence he would be focusing upon something rightly and Constitutionally within his powers as President. He can then attack any violent group with the maxim, "Advocating religious violence is not tolerable as a free exercise of religion." People can then draw their own conclusions combining the two ideas.

That would be politically effective without wearing the brand of "religious bigot" which, given your posting on behalf of a secular Gingrich (as opposed to Mr. Cain), I'm certain you would love to see.

Screw them. The American people are FED UP with the MSM telling them what to think, what not to think, what is "racist", what is not "racist". They know the truth and 2012 is proving to be the year of the One Big Middle Finger from Middle America to the US Mass Media Complex trying to tell us what to think through their ginned up narratives.. I say, think of the box, create further controversy, go for the BASE and run these ads. Afterall all you have to run is run their own words agains them with very little narrative or comment on your own. Let the libs scream "bigotry" and urinate all overthelmselves. Believe me, Joe G.O.P. Sixpack will know otherwise and will turn out in DROVES for Herman in the form of an "I have had enough of this crap" electoral backlash.