Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

Sad, but I am afraid I agree with you. Romney the chameleon will do better with actual primary voters than the polls indicate. The history is clear, GOP primary voters default to the safest option more often not - especially when the alternatives are so weak or untested. Newt or Cain might win in Iowa, but the pattern will establish itself pretty quickly in the rest of the states and it will follow basically along your predicted outcome.

The best we can hope for it Newt really gets his act together and grows into a very strong anti-Romney candidate. If the majority of movement conservatives and Tea Party folks get behind Newt early enough, it might change the dynamic.


45 posted on 11/19/2011 7:45:30 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Longbow1969
I think a case can be made that Newt would me a worse, more dangerous president than Romney. I'm not sure I like Newt over Romney when I look at their records, character, history.

I doubt I'll vote for either in the primary. Probably will either toss my vote away or not bother to show up. But if it's clearly a choice of Newt or Romney when the primaries hit NJ, I'll have to think about it.

57 posted on 11/19/2011 8:36:25 AM PST by Huck (Not sure if I can pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson