Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred

the establishment is growing concerned that their comrade romney may not be the nominee,

so they are coalescing around rino neutered-by-the-clintons.


3 posted on 11/18/2011 8:26:51 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ken21
You betcha


4 posted on 11/18/2011 8:32:32 PM PST by Fred (no job no house no gas no food no problem Obama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ken21

let the rino lovers split their vote between the two Rino’s, us conservatives need to stick with our man Cain and ignore the media bs


5 posted on 11/18/2011 8:34:57 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Cain 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ken21

I think you got it backwards. Newt got a balanced budget past Clinton, forged a Republican takeover, forced welform reform down the sleazeball’s throat, helped write the defense of marriage act, and did more than most conservatives ever have to advance the cause.

Maybe you could hit up the DNC for some new talking points?


7 posted on 11/18/2011 9:00:16 PM PST by moonhawk (Broken Heart(less) Hobbit for Sarah...Now for Newt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ken21

I am extremely vigilant to the healthcare debate. I firmly believe the purpose and the outcome of Obamacare is to bankrupt the US private healthcare industry resulting in widespread financial collapse of the entire US economic system. I have watched the “Center of Health Transformation” and Mr Gingrich’s role in this entity.
Quite frankly, its a fly on an elephant’s ass. Its a very small organization, with very vague goals and has played almost no role in the healthcare debate. Mr Gingrich as an “advisor” was probably no more than paying him a decent salary to be a recognizable name for a floundering company.
They have played virtually no role in shaping the healthcare debate. Their mission statement has been to protect privatized medicine and keep patient accountability in play. They have discussed and promoted widespread integrated systems and reduced cost of care, which if you are aware of any of the environment of healthcare today, is a standard, entry level talking point.

I have said on this website I am now strongly in support of Gingrich, so I dont want to hide that position on this thread.
That being said, no one is more critical of government’s role in healthcare than myself. I am a doctor in private healthcare and the business of private healthcare is in serious jeapordy. The collapse of private medicine in the US will make the housing collapse look like pocket change.
And from this perspective, I see no problem whatsoever with Gingrich’s participation with this healthcare advisory company.
They have not demonstrated any anti-private healthcare positions, and have not done anything to jeapordize private healthcare in any way that I can see. Gingrich has been clear in his campaign about the repeal of Obamacare which imo is essential, necessary for any semblence of future US financial viability. The US cannot survive full implementation of Obamacare.

The argument of Gingrich’s participation in this company as somehow showing him to have a liberal, statist stance on healthcare, and /or supportive of Obamacare has no basis in fact for me. Please tell me where I am wrong.


11 posted on 11/18/2011 9:10:08 PM PST by swingdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson