Innocent IN A COURT OF LAW until proven guilty. I have looked at the available facts and my considered opinion is that 1) Sandusky is indeed a pedophile who used the facilities and the (formerly) good name of Penn State football to lure pre-adolescent boys into a relationship where he molested many and raped some; 2) That Paterno--no later than 2002 and probably much earlier--KNEW about this and protected him.
The facts as so far presented bear this out. I am entitled to my opinion as stated as you are to yours. But, you and Franco are supporting a person who abetted child rape based on what we know.
So...you never had an opinion about OJ? Or Bill Clinton until the courts spoke?
Please...
And you are entitled to your "considered opinion" just like I am. But what you are NOT entitled to is to call for retribution and punishment of someone like Franco for expressing their opinion. That's the issue I raised in my original post, not whether the accused were guilty or not.
I don't cotton to the kind of mob rule and emotional rush to judgement to shut people up that you are practicing. THAT WAS MY POINT!!