Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Terry Mross

I was referring to the idea that Sandusky was running an underage homosexual prostitution ring with the blessing of his charity, the University, the football program, and half the town. That is a wild accusation. I personally believe that Sandusky is guilty of being a serial abuser based on the report. There is a convincing case for that. Even so, he gets his day in court.

The other accusations are, at this moment, completely unfounded. If some evidence can be found for that, then those involved deserve everything coming to them.


23 posted on 11/17/2011 1:02:53 PM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: flintsilver7

I don’t see any evidence for the pedophile ring idea. On the contrary, I think Sandusky is a highly organized child molester who wouldn’t put himself at the mercy of fellow abusers who might rat him out. I also think the Second Mile head who just quit and his wife, the agency’s #2 who’s now in charge, are both guilty as sin of enabling Sandusky’s crimes, knowingly or via intentional blindness.


30 posted on 11/17/2011 2:27:04 PM PST by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson