Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: heiss

That was a pool of under 400 registered Republicans. Quite a bit different from this poll which sampled around 1200 and was of LIKELY caucus goers. Newt may be ahead in some polls but this isn’t legitimate enough to use as an example. Of course “national” doesn’t really matter. It’s individual states that count.

Cindie


31 posted on 11/17/2011 10:50:58 AM PST by gardencatz (I'm lucky enough to live, walk & breathe among heroes! I am the mother of a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: gardencatz

The poll being discussed in this thread was as follows:

“and surveyed 979 registered Republicans and 277 registered independents. Of those polled, 377 (30.0 percent) stated that they definitely or probably would attend the Republican caucus on Tuesday, Jan. 3.”

So it’s 377 likely voters. It’s also a 13-day poll starting November 1st, so it won’t have caught the downtrend, or Gingrich’s upswing. And it shows that only 16% are committed to their pick; most say they are undecided, and the rest are only mildly interested in their choice.


45 posted on 11/17/2011 2:47:49 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson