Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: classified
If the D.A. was working on the case back in the 90’s and ended up missing in action, don’t you think that the police were somehow and sometime during that period called in to investigate the case?

Gricar, the DA who elected not to prosecute Sandusky in 1998 didn't disappear until April 15, 2005. It was two weeks after he'd announced that an investigation had cracked a major drug ring. And he may have committed suicide by drowning, as he car was found at a riverside. His brother previously committed suicide by drowning.

Gricar allegedly dislike Penn State and Penn State football and held a grudge. He may have had good reason not prosecute Sandusky, as Victim #6 was never sexually abused by Sandusky, only hugged, which is wrong but not necessarily illegal - and we don't know what else Gricar was able to find out about Sandusky. He may have felt people were holding out on the investigators. And he may have felt that Sandusky's position and Penn State's power kept people from talking.

But Gricar didn't disappear until almost exactly seven years after the phone calls that triggered the Victim #6 investigation, and most than six years after Gricar decided not to prosecute.

24 posted on 11/16/2011 5:52:57 PM PST by Scoutmaster (I stand for something; therefore, I can't stand Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

Okay but wouldn’t the Police be involved are somehow notified about Victim#6 which would put Sandusky’s name on the police radar at that time? Certainly if McQueary notifies the police on a second case wouldn’t or shouldn’t that register BIGTIME on the police’s radar?


27 posted on 11/16/2011 5:58:57 PM PST by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson