Your post doesn’t respond to my questions. I’m sincerely interested in what you’re trying to say/accomplish by your comment.
Are you implying that Timber Rattler has maybe made up the facts of Gingrich's record, as contained at the links, because he maybe supports a different candidate?
I'm going to assume that he does support a different candidate.....and No, I don't think he wrote any of the articles and made the stuff up as he wrote them.
If you read this information on a candidate's record AND you agreed it raised substantive questions, would you support that candidate?
The articles are moot because I don't take them as FACTS. I'd rather hear from the candidates mouth....the WHOLE context. But, if the articles do raise some concerns, I would wait to hear the candidates reply...if he wants to justify the article by replying. Cain shouldn't of replied to his allegations...just gave credence to it in my opinion.