To: umgud
I opposed this on 10th Amendment grounds. Don’t want the feds interfering in state issues at all......this will require them to have access to all the gun purchase/registration/CCW applications in all the states. None of their business.
5 posted on
11/16/2011 8:21:34 AM PST by
klb99
(I now understand why the South seceeded)
To: klb99
I opposed this on 10th Amendment grounds. I don't disagree with you. A better move would be a law that would allow or force SCOTUS to clean up 2A issues. The 2A is a national right and needs to be better defined and defended.
7 posted on
11/16/2011 8:38:10 AM PST by
umgud
To: klb99
this will require them to have access to all the gun purchase/registration/CCW applications in all the states
Interesting point/position. But don't all state CCW background checks ultimately go through the FBI already?
8 posted on
11/16/2011 8:41:07 AM PST by
Jay Santos CP
("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
To: klb99
No, it won’t. Read the law.
9 posted on
11/16/2011 8:45:47 AM PST by
Dan Nunn
(Support the NRA!)
To: klb99
I opposed this on 10th Amendment grounds. Dont want the feds interfering in state issues at all......this will require them to have access to all the gun purchase/registration/CCW applications in all the states. None of their business. Concur. I'd have preferred to see states whose CCW licenses are ignored in other states deny recognition of the drivers' licenses and vehicle registrations of those nonreciprocating states in response, as is now being considered in a couple of the westgern states.
And don't kid yourself. The feds have copies of the CCW/CCH license holders in everry state that issues them. Every one.
28 posted on
11/16/2011 11:07:18 AM PST by
archy
(I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson