ribbed; for her pleasure.
Hats off to the interviewers for allowing Sinclair to get his story out in a 2-hr interview, but they are frustratingly amateurish. If they were to let him talk without interruption, they might actually obtain new information and make some news.
I haven’t read his book, but know his basic account. Sinclair is highly credible, but if the interview makes any “new” news, it will be in spite of the interviewers’ constant interjections. They managed to interrupt him at every critical point.