To: Recovering_Democrat
The players have a contract with the NBA owners. The NBA owners are locking the players out and not living up to their contracts, ie holding out to renegotiate that contract because they view it has become a bad contract.
Certainly a conservative who believes in contracts has some sympathy with the players. Equally a conservative that is pro-business has some sympathy with the owners.
4 posted on
11/15/2011 7:30:30 AM PST by
JLS
(How to turn a recession into a depression: elect a Dem president with a big majorities in Congress)
To: JLS
This is what happens when both sides have unlimited budgets to hire lawyers.
5 posted on
11/15/2011 7:35:22 AM PST by
DManA
To: JLS
The players and owners had a contract which expired in June. The contracts no longer binds anyone. Not sure why, in this situation, you would feel sympathy for either party.
6 posted on
11/15/2011 7:38:34 AM PST by
SorbetCon
To: JLS
Certainly a conservative who believes in contracts has some sympathy with the players. Equally a conservative that is pro-business has some sympathy with the owners.
I do not have sympathy with either side. This situation involves two cartels fighting over the spoils of a lucrative industry. Perhaps major professional sports are a natural monopoly. If yes, the monopoly should be regulated. Major professional sports have gained enormous taxpayer subsidies to increase revenues and compensation. Professional sports have also negotiated lucrative broadcasting contracts that many pay tv customers have little choice in paying.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson