Yeah, let’s see how long that ruling stands.
Also, how about telling us the name of the judge who ruled against private property rights in favor of a defecating, raping, polluting mob.
If that were the case, there would be shanty towns in every city center.
This is a show down in court. You never know with NY however ... any Democratic city.
Apparently, the judge who issued the injunction sits on the New York State Court (see Post No. 15, below), as opposed to the Federal District Court, and as a result, the injunction is meaningless if Bloomburg decides to appeal the order to the Appellate Division. Why? Because New York law automatically stays the enforcement of an injuction or other order against a municipality to maintain the status quo pending appeal. The stay kicks in as soon as Bloomberg files the notice of appeal.
And his home address so people know where to walk their dogs.
Actually, I hope that this "occupy" circus goes on until the 2012 elections.
The problem with the "occupiers" is that they can't count - they are not a "99%" - they may be, at most, between 0.0099% and 0.099%; that's a difference in orders of magnitude.
Democrats already start to understand that the "occupiers" are a liability, not an asset, and that the focus has already shifted from the "Wall Street fat cats" and "big bankers" to the "occupiers themselves and how they hurt the real 99%.
Small Business Owners Tell Occupy Wall Street: You're Hurting the 99% - CNBC / CSM, 2011 November 11
The evidence is that few Democrats recently came out endorsing the OWS and big city Democratic mayors are facing major problems with and are trying to disperse and disband the OWS wannabes.
I say that the putsch has failed miserably, and the Dems want this blight out of the public's sight and mind.
Do you remember the French police who stood around all summer in what was it... 07(?) and watched as the asian utes burned thousands and thousands of cars, night after night, for months? Do you expect more of US American politicans?