Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna
Yes, Sandusky is LEGALLY innocent, we can all agree on that.

But don't try to defend him on these threads as if this is a court room-it isn't.

285 posted on 11/15/2011 3:53:38 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration

And we’re looking at not just in the technical sense now, but that it is very possible the case against him will fall apart in the courtroom, without even Melvin Belli for the defense, and the judge himself will direct a not guilty verdict.

And the witnesses to the showers will have seen just that — showers. Weird perhaps, the kind of thing you might expect to see a fond dad but not a coach do, but yet not rising to the level of tort or crime.

If Sandusky has buggered even one kid, I hope the kid shows up and testifies to it. The scandal has opened Sandusky as wide (pun not intended) to being exploited for that purpose as he could ever be. There’s no reason the kid should not try if he had been buggered.


287 posted on 11/15/2011 4:01:55 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (bloodwashed not whitewashed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson