Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Proud Canadian

Calm down will ya.

Why wouldn’t you want to hook oil producers Canada, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas all together via a pipeline route since they plan on building one anyway?

There’s also a pretty serious east-west rail corridor going through CO, NE, IA etc.


36 posted on 11/14/2011 6:35:49 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER
Ok. Here's the deal. TransCanada builds pipelines and moves oil. There is A LOT of oil being produced in Northern Alberta. The producers of that oil lined up customers in the gulf region, a large refinery complex. The existing infrastructure in the gulf was a perfect fit to the grade of oil to be delivered. Plus, there is an existing network of product pipelines and storage facilities to store and move the refined products to market.

The Keystone XL would simply move raw materials to the processing plants in Texas which would refine it and ship it to market.

Obama made a purely political decision that will cost America thousands of jobs, a secure supply of oil and, as a bonus, send those jobs and that oil to America's avowed enemy, China.

I don't know what else to say. I don't know how else to explain it. I don't understand your post.

38 posted on 11/14/2011 6:43:18 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, or the jobs that go with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson