Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoJoCo
But you seem to prefer the arbitrary whims of some unidentified ‘guardian’ to a set policy.

Subject to Fourteenth Amendment protections, states are free to set their own standards with regard to how people are adjudicated mentally incompetent, and how the affairs of such persons are managed. It would seem that the legal standard for finding someone sufficiently mentally incompetent that they cannot be allowed to do things like make their purchasing decisions should be pretty similar to that required to disarm them on the basis of mental incompetence.

64 posted on 11/15/2011 4:22:45 PM PST by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
Subject to Fourteenth Amendment protections, states are free to set their own standards with regard to how people are adjudicated mentally incompetent, and how the affairs of such persons are managed.

The 14th Amendment says that the state has the right to deprive a person of liberty or property so long as it is done with due process of law. So shouldn't that include the right to decide that a person convicted of a violent crime shouldn't be trusted with a firearm?

75 posted on 11/15/2011 5:55:53 PM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson