No.
Tell me that you evaluated the possibility that he was telling the truth. Tell me that if anyone was engaging in personal attacks on him BEFORE they evaluated what he had to say, they were acting basely.
Tell me that you are as interested in knowing the "flaws" in our candidates as vigorously as you would in Obama/Clinton/et al.
I am not anti-Cain. I am a Perry supporter, but I'm not anti-Cain.
That being said, when a private person brings up information that appears to be negative to one's candidate, the healthy first response should not be to attack the person before evaluating the quality/merit of the information.
Do you disagree?
Because if they did have the goods on Cain, it would have come out by now, it’s clear they are trying to dig up any person who will take Soros’ money and read the script provided.
Are you serious? we have no way to verify whether this guy was told this story years ago or not. Credibility is a valid factor for us to consider. Now that we know the witness is a sleasebag and is not credible it really doesn't matter what he says.