Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victor Zuckerman, Bialek's "witness" and his fun lawsuit escapades
http://il.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/ ^ | 11/14/11 | struggle

Posted on 11/14/2011 10:23:05 AM PST by struggle

HOLY S*** GUYS STRUGGLE STRIKES GOLD AGAIN!

http://il.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20110324_0000757.NIL.htm/qx

LOLOLOLOLLLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOL

So that’s why Zuckerman wants money!

Send this to Cain and all your media outlets!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allred; baddoctor; bankrupt; bialek; cain; charlatan; dnccanesblacks; dnccanescain; dncplantation; grifter; lawsuits; mediawhores; sourcetitlenoturl; zuckerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-348 next last
To: justlurking
Most common procedures: Circumcision.

Well yeah, technically, if he cuts himself shaving it's a circumcision.

281 posted on 11/14/2011 4:39:40 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: struggle

How the heck did this guy end up in Ruston, Louisiana my old alma mater?


282 posted on 11/14/2011 4:42:39 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorBulldog

That is a scream. Thanks for the link. When I need a good laugh I take a look.


283 posted on 11/14/2011 4:46:43 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Chasaway

May you be blessed.

You questioned me and received an answer before passing judgment upon me.

I appreciate that.

United We Stand.


284 posted on 11/14/2011 5:05:44 PM PST by left that other site (Psalm 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Chasaway

Whatever. Not playing the game. You just want to obfuscate instead of engage in a debate.


285 posted on 11/14/2011 5:07:04 PM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

You are 100% percent correct.


286 posted on 11/14/2011 5:08:46 PM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: marty60
NO the problem with credibility is that if anyone seems to not be a kool-aid drinker for Cain, they (us) are attacked here.

Marty, I don't know you from Adam or Eve.

The first time I ever saw a posting from you is when you butted in on this thread and started attacking everyone that pointed out problems with Zuckerman's credibility.

And now, you are deigning to be offended. If you didn't want your attack to be countered, you should have just stayed away from this discussion.

So, I implore you: just go away. You aren't doing yourself any favors by sticking around.

287 posted on 11/14/2011 5:11:16 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Fu-fu2

Interesting!

My Dear Mom, a lifelong democrat (Though she did not vote for obama!) saw Gloria Cain on TV and thought she was wonderful...a real LADY, she said.


288 posted on 11/14/2011 5:12:06 PM PST by left that other site (Psalm 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Chasaway
That being said, when a private person brings up information that appears to be negative to one's candidate, the healthy first response should not be to attack the person before evaluating the quality/merit of the information. Do you disagree?

Are you serious? we have no way to verify whether this guy was told this story years ago or not. Credibility is a valid factor for us to consider. Now that we know the witness is a sleasebag and is not credible it really doesn't matter what he says.

289 posted on 11/14/2011 5:17:46 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Been here since 98. Well gee I’m sorry for interrupting the bashing. Funny thing I was watching the news conference I thought I would check out FR. And there it was attacks on the man and he wasn’t even done with his statement. What did Cain do send out talking points?
EXXXCCCCUUUUSSSEEEE ME!


290 posted on 11/14/2011 5:19:21 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Chasaway

Face it, Perry is over too. Those clips over many debates will be used over and over.

He is thought of as a dummy who people now feel sorry for but not inclined to vote for him.

The people who left Cain went to Newt, not the gaffemaster Perry.


291 posted on 11/14/2011 5:19:33 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]



**click above to donate ~~ thank you!**

292 posted on 11/14/2011 5:30:29 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker dowTn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Indeed. All I did was suggest that the Cain team get pinged to a thread about Cain (which is quite reasonable), and ....Wow!

I won’t say anymore, because I might get accused of being a “Cainiac”, a Liar or something worse.

(sigh)


293 posted on 11/14/2011 5:38:58 PM PST by left that other site (Psalm 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: marty60
Been here since 98.

Don't play word games with me. You know exactly what I meant. I was asking you to stop butting in on other discussions for the sole purpose of attacking other Republican candidates.

You want to start your own thread, preferably with an article that supports your position? You've been around long enough to know that's the original purpose of this site. And you can discuss the merits (or lack thereof) of the candidate of your choice.

Well gee I’m sorry for interrupting the bashing.

If you are going to stick your nose in another discussion and open with attacks on the people that are participating, you should expect them to respond in kind.

And when it happens, you have no right to whine about it. You invited it. So, start acting like an adult and take responsibility for the consequences of your actions.

And there it was attacks on the man and he wasn’t even done with his statement. What did Cain do send out talking points?

The original poster discovered the name early, presumably from the Chicago TV station's article that leaked it before the press conference. From there, it was only a simple web search to find a court case that described past questionable behavior on the part of the accuser.

And if you were listening to the press conference, you would have have heard the accuser confirm nearly everything that was posted: he filed for bankruptcy, and moved from Chicago to Louisiana afterward. He operates a pediatric practice and is the medical director for a boxox clinic. Of course, he left out that little tidbit about gambling away the proceeds from sale of his practice in Illinois.

If someone makes accusations impugning the character of another person, then they should expect questions about their own character -- especially if there is absolutely no evidence of what occurred. Right now, we have nothing more than "she said", "he said", and another "he said". Of those three, one has to decide which one to believe. And right now, it's not looking good for two out of the three.

I know you want to believe them, but their past behavior gives you no reason to do so -- other than you want to believe. But yet, you are willing to discount anything Cain says to the contrary, despite no evidence to support you.

And when confronted about it, you responded by launching into personal attacks on Cain. Are you not seeing the pattern here?

294 posted on 11/14/2011 5:46:00 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

Bookmark


295 posted on 11/14/2011 5:51:58 PM PST by potlatch (*snip*~ “Having the right to be angry doesn’t give one the right to be cruel. ~*snip*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Didn’t take her seriously before this.


296 posted on 11/14/2011 5:54:12 PM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: struggle

bttt


297 posted on 11/14/2011 5:56:44 PM PST by GOPJ ( Democrats are the only reason to vote for Republicans.... Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Please put a disclaimer on the post that you want reserved for only people that agree with you.

That way the rest of us will know to avoid any thread that you are on.

Thank you in advance.

Cain is STILL inexperienced and unqualified to even be in the primaries.


298 posted on 11/14/2011 6:32:47 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Don’t take this the wrong way, but what, in your view, are the specific qualifications for a candidate for POTUS?

I’ll punk myself out a bit: I used to think that the list looked kinda like this:
a) Experience running a business, or farm, or some other private enterprise
b) Experience in some executive capacity in elected office (eg, a governor)
c) Experience at some level of command in a branch of the military.

But, that gets you Jimmy Carter. Seems that character, intelligence, and general grit might be more important. Dunno. Just asked, as you seem to have an idea.


299 posted on 11/14/2011 7:11:00 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You can never do more, you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Actually Carter didn’t COMMAND troops as I think we both might be thinking.

I like your qualifications.

A non starter for me is a Lobbyist, an arrogant- “I’m entitled” person. Over the hill Congress/Senate people. Rich boys that like to globe trot.

Well you get the idea. It’s just that everything is so bad right now, I think we need an extremely strong knowledgeable person, that can take the criticism that inevitably comes with the job. No thin skins in this job.

Look at how snarky thin skinned Zero is. He acts like a spoiled brat.


300 posted on 11/14/2011 7:42:53 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson