Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

“Would you prefer that or Newt’s final, personally overseen budget that had over 125 billion in surplus? Additionally, the first two years of Newt’s speakership, the deficit nosedived to 100 billion and then to 22 billion. Then he had his 2 surpluses, and then based on his policies, the next two years were also surpluses.”

And you are arguing that Newt, and only would be able to do the same as President?

What’s to stop Gingrich from going all wobbly on us and reaching across the aisle to Pelosi, et al?


77 posted on 11/14/2011 2:30:18 PM PST by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: BenKenobi

Newt has done it before. It makes sense that he could do it again.

Romney is a liberal. Cain is an unknown quantity regarding life and taxation. Perry can’t seem to get his act together. Gingrich has some personal life issues. Santorum can’t get traction. Bachman over-reached and is nose-diving.

None of the above, however, except Gingrich, has ever balanced a federal budget, and that with a democratic president fighting him.

Gingrich doing the global warming spot with Pelosi has 2 important caveats: (1) he said it was a dumb mistake, and (2) it happened BEFORE the East Anglia research fraud was exposed by an email hacker.


83 posted on 11/14/2011 3:21:59 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson