“... Sandusky targeted from all of those in that organization already exhibited effeminate characteristics...”
I don’t believe so. I do believe he targeted little boys that may have had a history of family instability, behavior problems, or a history of possible prior physical/sexual abuse. Why else start a foundation for troubled boys... easy pickings since no one would believe them or they didn’t have a strong enough family unit around them to see something as wrong. I do believe that a crime like this is probably one of the most underreported ones. Why? Simply put... it carries a lot of stigma and questions NOT posed to little girls who are molested. For example, why didn’t the boy fight? What if he was the “seducer”? Or, “what if he was really gay and just experimenting with an older “lover?” If someone presented those questions to a eight year old girl... most people would slap them. However, many people are perfectly comfortable asking those horrible questions to a little boy. IMHO, children are innocent. Both boys and girls. Any person, male or female, robbing them of that innocence is evil.
See 52.