Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/13/2011 12:55:02 AM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: South40

I don’t know why the GOP is still dancing for the msm. If I were in charge I’d make sure every debate were moderated by Republican/Conservatives period there would be none of this crap. Republicans gain nothing from this dance. It ends up with solid candidates made to look like fools while liberal favorites are benefited. It is really insane and it needs to change.


2 posted on 11/13/2011 12:59:58 AM PST by Maelstorm (Better to keep your enemy in your sights than in your camp expecting him to guard your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

This was like cutting off a world title boxing match in the 8th round, and saying: go to the web to see the rest. THEN, not having enough bandwidth?! Totally ridiculous.


3 posted on 11/13/2011 1:00:05 AM PST by jageorge72 (www.newtvsobama.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

I wish they’d take the Cain/Gingrich debate model and simply work it out among themselves. The voters they’re trying to get will tune in, be it online or on cable. Who is watching this thing now, a year out? I am guessing the Republicans who vote in primaries will seek debates out.

I don’t need to hear another word from Bachmann, Paul, Huntsman or Santorum. If the others had their own debates, I’d learn more about those who have a chance at my vote. I’ll just not watch the others. Why can’t these Republicans think on their own and come up with something like this, something new? The days of these kinds of debates with hostile media boobs should be over—they will be soon. Why not take the initiative?


4 posted on 11/13/2011 1:04:25 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Obama: The stupid person`s idea of a smart person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

...unusally detailed discussion of policy??

Didn’t they give them one minute and then interrupt them often??

Wasn’t Romney the only one allowed to follow up most of the time?


5 posted on 11/13/2011 1:05:26 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

CBS=Can`t Broadcast S**t

That was truly pathetic. Not two uninterrupted seconds could pass with the live feed seizing up. I was wondering if that was CBS` attempt to turn viewers away from the debate. That was the very first time I`ve ever seen a network cut television viewers off and redirect them to a pitifully subpar internet site, especially 2/3 the way through an event like that.

Bet that would never happen to a democrat debate... but of course things are always different when you`re hosting the boss.


7 posted on 11/13/2011 2:21:14 AM PST by ScottinVA (Hurrah me boys, for FREEDOM! `Tis the risin` o` the moon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
On the positive side, to contrast with the worst of the spring debates, we didn't have much muttering, murmuring or groaning during answers.

There also weren't any "Coke or Pepsi?" questions.

Beyond that, the time keeping was atrocious with Perry cut off mid-answer because the last 30 min, broadcast online, had "run out of time." Interruptions during 60 second answers were at times out of hand. Follow-ups too often went to Romney.

8 posted on 11/13/2011 2:21:30 AM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama and Speaker Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

“A network spokeswoman, Sonya McNair, said its livestream had been overwhelmed by an unexpectedly large audience, and brushed off complaints.”

Maybe we should simply “brush off” CBS.


9 posted on 11/13/2011 3:22:20 AM PST by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40
Evidence they're trying to manipulate who is in and who is out.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
10 posted on 11/13/2011 3:59:07 AM PST by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40
Bachmann Suggests Bias in Saturday’s Debate — Campaign Manager Says CBS Analyst Is a ‘Piece of S***’
12 posted on 11/13/2011 4:13:40 AM PST by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

For those who would like to see the whole debate:

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7388072n


13 posted on 11/13/2011 4:22:53 AM PST by RetSignman (It's Fall...the "Goebbles Warmers" are packing their bags , migrating for their winter caves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

they could cancel all the remaining “romney shows” and i’d be perfectly happy.


15 posted on 11/13/2011 5:30:45 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Cain 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

the only thing that surprises me at this point is that they haven’t asked Michael Moore to moderate any of these yet.

*sigh*

The Romney show continues, and apparently is close to being cancelled based on them cutting away in the middle.


16 posted on 11/13/2011 5:47:07 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Cain 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

17 posted on 11/13/2011 5:51:43 AM PST by EternalVigilance (I'm not a Republican and I'm not a Democrat. I'm an American. SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South40

In retrospect, I would have preferred fewer questions & a minute for EACH & EVERY candidate to answer that question.

This debate format was somewhat disjointed, IMO.


20 posted on 11/13/2011 7:41:53 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson