No, but that's a big one.
I am a TEA Party conservative. Perry is anything but.
The TP does not agree with Perry on the big-government, nanny-state Gardasil debacle.
The TP does not agree with Perry on his opposition to the border fence.
The TP does not agree with Perry on his opposition to Arizona trying to defend itself from the ILLEGAL hordes that he wants to make citizens.
The TP opposed Perry on the TTC.
The TP does not support Perry’s warped view that anyone opposing instate tuition for ILLEGAL aliens does so because of the ILLEGAL aliens’ last names.
The TP did not agree with Obama and Pelosi’s stimulus bailout plan yet Perry took stimulus cash anyway.
Rick Perry is a big government, crony capitalist neocon candidate. He is a fraud and anything but in line with the TP's core principles.
Thank you for asking.
For example: The TP does not agree with Perry on his opposition to the border fence.
Perry does not oppos a border fence, He is a strong proponent of border security, including fences wherever they will be helpful, and not just a waste of money. NumbersUsa rated Perry good on border security. He's actually taken ACTION on border security.
Or this:
The TP does not agree with Perry on his opposition to Arizona trying to defend itself from the ILLEGAL hordes that he wants to make citizens.
Perry does not oppose Arizona defending itself. IN fact, he strongly supports them, and had his AG file a brief supporting Arizona in court. He didn't want to copy the Arizona law in TEXAS.
If you can't defend your own candidate, and I know that is especially hard after tonight's debate, as Cain has pretty much conceded he is a neophyte on foreign policy, you could at least try to find factual stuff to attack Perry for. He did a few bad things you could cite.
Operative word being "did", because he actually has a record. It's probably easier for you supporting a candidate who never did anything, because that way he has no record you have to pretend doesn't exist.