Posted on 11/12/2011 2:25:13 PM PST by katiedidit1
He does. And that's who is supposed to be able to defeat Obama? lol!
He must’ve used a bigger marker this time :)
you were watching a different debate than i.
You don’t like phoney warmongers. So I guess that means you want a genuine warmonger.
Don’t worry, Newt shot Pelly between the eyes several times, I laughtd my a$$ off!
I thought Perry was the strongest, along with Newt..well, Bachman sort of too..on being tough internationally and a strong defense. AND winning in war.
Seemed to be winging it to me.
I don’t think Perry did a good job.
Newt did a good job for a Republican electorate; but, of course, Paultards would disagree with the substance of Newt’s views. But they don’t matter, because they’re developmentally stunted.
I agree. Compared to most debates..this one was just rude the way it was conducted. But it was CBS so we really should not be surprised.
Why does everyone need a teleprompter? Obama seems fake and too fake with it.
CBSNews stream just started again, live, with after-debate commentaries.
FYI
yeah I did!.... didn’t I
Ok he beats Paul!
Not even close halfwit. But many are, hopefully you will join them soon. You are just a pathetic creature. Wish the worst for miserable a-holes like you.
Hey, I just describe 'em exactly how I've seen the PaulBots over the years at CPAC. The same odd bunch has shown up every year since Paul has been running for President.
Assuming we can afford to go to CPAC again this February (Grrr... ACU jacked up the prices again), I'll do my best to take pics of the dweeby little Ron Paul cultists. ;-)
u be series?
There were a few attempted Government-Controlled MSM gotcha's, though, as we knew there would be.
However, truth be told, Mr. Cain did not shine on foreign policy as much as I wished he would have, and in comparison with two or so of the others up there. So having said that, (and I am not a "yes man" in corporate life, and I would tell this to his face, and I hope his people listening here!!!!!!), God love him, but that great, lovable man Herman Cain has GOT to hire somebody ASAP like Amb. Bolton, bring him on his bus, and have 2 hour disciplined tutoring sessions DAILY on foreign policy issues w/ open source intelligence reports on a morning daily basis, to drill down deeper and past the "I don't know, I will hire the best minds to tell me." This is a weak spot and Obama would exploit it and it is unsustainable. It is an area where Herman Cain in fact can excel since he is the turnaround man. I know he can do it. But it simply MUST START FROM TOMORROW MORNING. I don't mean maybe. I have said it before, and I will say it again, for his own darned good.
(Fellow Herman Cain supporters: Don't shoot the messenger now; this is all said and observed objectively for his own good and quality control and upgrading his creds and grasp).
Probably Gingrich won this one as well, being fair. I think the biggest loser was that asshat Ron Paul, and maybe whiny Santorum and Bachmann Overdrive following him (Huntsman of course, too). Perry recovered, but had some illogical, Texas-Shoot-From-The-Hip Red Meat approaches on some aspects (Pakistan) that will not cut it IMHO. I was VERY disappointed that NORTH KOREA did not come up, the country which may very well next attack the United States and our allies in the Northeast Asian Regional theatre.
Considering that Cain was asked the very FIRST question and Perry, Gingrich and Santorum agreed with him, I'd say your observation is pfffft. :)
Perry was stating his point...and those he is strong.
Give him credit where it is due. I give credit to others when they are strong on their points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
