To: Smokin' Joe
I suspect that someone who put such a sign on his house and was himself armed, should he shoot an intruder, would be adjudged guilty of murder because he had that sign that effectively notifies a home invader that it is safe to invade that home.
49 posted on
11/12/2011 4:26:14 PM PST by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
To: arthurus
I suspect that someone who put such a sign on his house and was himself armed, should he shoot an intruder, would be adjudged guilty of murder because he had that sign that effectively notifies a home invader that it is safe to invade that home.No, it just says they can't bring their gun in, nothing about what you can have in your own home. Life ain't fair.
53 posted on
11/12/2011 4:36:59 PM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: arthurus
I suspect that someone who put such a sign on his house and was himself armed, should he shoot an intruder, would be adjudged guilty of murder because he had that sign that effectively notifies a home invader that it is safe to invade that home.I disagree. Just because you forbid others from being armed on your property in no way implies that you're unarmed. You'd prohibit your neighbor from parking in your driveway, but you park there don't you?
67 posted on
11/12/2011 5:42:13 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson