btw END THE FED!
Posted on 11/12/2011 8:54:58 AM PST by Java4Jay
Thank you for your post.
"Examples??""
Here are three quick examples:
1. Man made Global Warming
2. DeDe Scozzafava
3. Amnesty
One thing we all forget is that once a fellow is inside the White Hut, he has to play by different rules than those during the campaign and during the stupid without exceptions debates. He’ll break the (forgotten now) promises, he’ll quiet down, harsh fracking realities of the world are upon him. Is Obomba now the stalinist he was prior to the election, and that he still is in his cheating heart? Hardly, even if he tries. So in the end, realistically, we, or the CPUSA, get the milquetoast of the dude in the debates. Sure, as we are seeing, the damage can be more than enough, but it still isn’t what Bill Ayers and Chairman Bob Avakian would love to see. Even Ron Paul (what’s his last name?) would have to become somewhat reasonable in the once in the WH. That old ‘warmonger’ Goldwater would have to too! Choose on the character and not on the cliched specifics they recite to sway you during these “debates”.
Newt is the real Socialist impostor; is that what you mean?
>> “Newt is more real than obama.” <<
.
If you’re talking about being a socialist thug, its about a tie between them.
Can Newt overcome the negatives of his past? Would he be able to overcome the vicious attacks from the Obama Media Group that would make their attack on Herman Cain look like a walk in the park? Newt answered the question best – as he was considering a run for the presidency:
“I believe in a forgiving God, and the American people will have to decide whether that is their primary concern,” Gingrich said. “If the primary concern of the American people is my past, my candidacy would be irrelevant. If the primary concern of the American people is the future … that’s a debate I’ll be happy to have.”
That’s also a debate millions of Americans would love to see: Newt Gingrich vs. Barack Obama – mano-a-mano. No holds barred. Last man standing. Poor Barack. Damn.
If it does come down to Newt vs. Obama a year from now, the question that Americans must ask themselves – and answer – is this:
Are you more concerned with Newt Gingrich’s past, or Barack Obama’s future?
btw END THE FED!
No Newt, no way. Just another establishment RINO, and an immoral despicable creature. I will not vote for him anymore than Romney or Obama.
That is also a major concern. I listed what came right off the top of my head. I can write a small book why Newt would turn out to be another McBush.
No question Newt is better than Obama by a very large degree.
But he has taken too many liberal positions in the past.
See my post above in this thread. He is essentially a McBush.
So National Security is your issue?
What is the most pressing foreign policy issue of our day?
Iran’s attempt to get nukes and missiles to delver them.
So what do we do? Invade a 4th country? Ignore it? Start a covert war with Iran? Help the Gulf Arabs and the Israelis get nukes also?
OR Do we make forceful clear statement, as Cain would, that any attack on Israel will be viewed as an attack on the USA.
Then we do back up that statement, as Cain says, an build up our system of naval warships (i.e the Aegis ships Cain is talking about) that have the ability to knock down any Iranian missiles in flight thus giving our side an ability to neutralize the Iranian threat and protect our regional interests, without starting yet another war or adding to the destabilizing of the region.
Can we really just rely on Mutual Assured Destruction to Contain the leaders of an Iranian Death Cult that believes that a massive act of suicide will usher in the rule of the Hidden Mahdi?
Cain is the only one who looked at the real problem with Iran and said “here are the solutions”
“Cain is the only one who looked at the real problem with Iran and said ‘here are the solutions’” I didn’t like Cain’s “solutions”, in my opinion they won’t work. We have to be willing to invade and conquer Iran....Newt said he would. Notice also, that Newt had praise for Cain’s ideas and others.
I cannot be any clearer than this. I AM NOT a Newt supporter/booster/chearleader. He has serious flaws of character and he has not be consistent. However, when I look at things dispasionately, I realize he is the only person with Gravitas to sit in the big chair and protect this country from foreign & domestic threats. That is my opinion....I could be wrong. It is only a opinion, so stop trying to preach the “Gospel of Cain” to me, because I’m not buying it. IF economic danger was the only threat, I would lean more in Cain’s direction. I actually like the man “Cain” more than I like the man “Newt.” But honesty tells me I want someone more seasoned in the big chair.
As I stated in a previous post, I am a moral/social conservative first. I would prefer a candidate pledged to restore DADT and get homosexuals out of the military. I would prefer a candidate that will help get a constitutional ammendment to end legal abortion. I’m NOT going to get those things. So, knowing that isn’t going to happend, I have to go with my third priority...national defense. Newt “talks” the “best” on this issue and mirrors my views. So, I will vote for him in the primary.
I’m NOT going to beat drum for him, or put him on a pedestal as so many here do with their pick. He is simply my pick. Also, I like his graciousness to his competitors...he at least acts like a statesman.
I am from Texas. There are things that happened with Perry that I DO NOT like, but I think he is warming up to the ability to debate. I was very impressed with him at the last debate. He has some very good ideas in his platform and I believe that it is not time to drop him as a possibility for endorsement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.