I think the bigger point is that Cain making these type of statements isn’t particularly wise. Certainly these statements are meant in jest. However, they become a distraction when Cain is supposed to be trying to get back on message. These comments only serve to keep the story alive when Cain’s focus should be putting the story to rest.
This is another indication of inexperience. Inexperience in politics can - and most likely will be - fatal in the general.
Before you start flaming me... Cain was on Cavuto today and this very topic came up. Cavuto suggested in a question that this kind of stuff can become a liability. Cain agreed that he needed to tone it down a notch. However, that notch was only going to go from a 10 the a “9”...
“I think the bigger point is that Cain making these type of statements isn’t particularly wise.”
Well, you’re welcome to side with Anita Hill, but there are A LOT of Republicans with long memories that IDOLIZE Clarence Thomas. Hill was there for ONE REASON, which was to sink his nomination. She LIED THROUGH HER TEETH and nearly pulled it off.
If you really believe her, then simply ask this question: WHERE ARE THE OTHER WOMEN. It’s been 20 years now, if Thomas was such a sex-fiend, as you imply, there should be MANY, MANY, more women that have been his victims since those hearings.
So go shove it.
As an American I am sick and tired of all this “Political Correctness Crap”.
That why our Country is in such turmoil today. No one will call a spade a spade!
Now, I think Herman would not take offense to that statement~
That may be a point, but it’s not the bigger point. The bigger point is what this says about Newt. Not what it says about Cain.
Yeah, that inexperience was fatal for Obama in the general ele...oh wait!