Trotting out the death penalty and it looking stupid was a by-product. If one argues that the “inalienable” right of life extends so far to god that no one of this earthly realm is able to take that right away, how can you ever be for the death penalty. We’re talking INALIENABLE. I argued against the limits of this right. So maybe re-read a bit and see it more in focus. (for the record I’m pro-life/death penalty, in case the water got really blurry here) Just the position that life is so sacrosanct that even I couldn’t die if I wanted to from a vegetative state, makes me wonder how someone that goes that far can drop the axe, and how they reason it.
Your run-on and ungrammatical sentences are very hard to follow. Apparently you seem to be saying that you are pro-life, but you want someone to be able to kill you if you want to die but can’t do it yourself.
You mock wagglebee for being pro-life and pro-death penalty (I think that’s what you’re saying) and yet you claim that you are pro-life and pro-death penalty.
Your thinking seems disordered.
For the record, it is obvious that executions for capital crimes is not incongruous with the right to life. One forfeits that right to life when he deprives someone else of their life.