I totally agree with you. Most Republicans have reached the point of stupification when it comes to Herman Cain. Don’t try to confuse them with facts. Herman Cain LIED about kknowing about the payoff right out of the box. That costs him a lot of points in my book. There’s an old adage that says “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” Sadly, for the blind Cain followers, that applies to their idol Cain as well as Bill Clinton and Anthon Weiner.
I cannot help thinking it is utterly moronic to compare the real accusations that were prove with evidence about Clinton with completely unsubstantiated accusations made up at Cain.
We had proof against Clinton. Where is ever 1 bit of proof, other then accusations against Cain?
Shame on you people. There is more at risk here then merely helping your candidate of choice win an election. If they can get away with this guilt by accusation smear at Cain, YOUR candidate will be next.
You are disingenuous.
Mr. Cain was not part of the agreement or settlement.
He had no knowledge and therefore did not lie.
In fact, his behavior AFTER that indicates he was made
more aware of it, and then himself made more known.
The agreement was controlled by NRA/Marriott, as discussed
in previous threads, just before the Rove-powered,
RomneyBought scandal du jour was launched.
No the one lying is you. If you bothered to actually listen to the facts of the matter there was no "payoff". Two problem employees were dismissed with a severance package. Mr Cain had not part of those agreements. They were made AFTER he left NRA.
So rather then pimp the smear based on nothing but emotion, how about you learn the FACTS of the matter before posting about it?
Pay off for what? There was no settlement to the harrassment claim. The only "pay out" associated with a separation agreement, which many companies offer.
And how do you know Cain "lied" as you claim? Or do you just like making accusations with no evidence?
“Most Republicans have reached the point of stupification when it comes to Herman Cain.”
- Wrong.
“Herman Cain LIED about kknowing about the payoff right out of the box.”
- Prove it by laying out for all of us “stupid” people the questions asked and answers given. Cite links, sources and specifics.
Since you made accusation, I am sure you will be able to back it up. Thank you!
There's another older adage, actually a mainstay of our free country.....innocent until proven guilty!
Show one bit of proof that Cain has does anything untoward with these women.
I can tell you that my teenage son was sued because of a car accident.It took them almost one year to figure out how they were going to 'get' us....the "victim's" husband sued for lack of consortium. She was a shyster but our insurance company settled. We were never informed of the settlement.
That's how it works in the real world. You are not necessarily told what is going on when a settlement occurs.
Before you lay all blame at Cain's feet, look at the motive of two suspect women. Miss "Happy at the mic" lives in the same apt. complex as David Axlerod and the other one brought suit against a subsequent employer partly for an email that she deemed inappropriate (too sexual in nature).
Plus, Cain has a long public career, why are these claims from only a 2 year period out of what, 30 years?
You should really think things through instead of just throwing out baseless accusations.