“So even if it’s true - and I doubt it is - its not anywhere near the level of what Clinton and Weiner did.”
Comparing Cain’s offenses to that of other cads does NOT make him any less an offender or change the fact that he lied about it.
So, according to you, all business people wink at using one’s position to solicit sexual favors if they take “no” for an answer? Your principles are showing(or not).
Thank Heaven, some businesses still cling to that old, outdated, basic morality that you deem “prudish”. If they didn’t, there would be no such phrase as “sexual harrassment” and no remedy for it’s occurance.
Cain is not a cad.
Nice try, propagandist.
>> Comparing Cain’s offenses to that of other cads does NOT make him any less an offender or change the fact that he lied about it. >>
You are perverting logic and ignoring perspective and denying facts in order to advance your agenda. If you will refuse to acknowledge a huge difference in both the seriousness of the charges and in the level of the evidence then dialoguing with you is a waste of time. Meanwhile you hide behind moral absolutes even the Apostles could not live up to.
I stand by my earlier hypothesis: you are likely a prude and likely have no experience being in any position of authority and responsibility for any length of time.