Apparently not. I post nothing to you about Joe and you come back with the accusations. It is you that are fixated on Joe, not me. Most every post I have made discussing Joe has been in response to posts you and Tribune7 have made. If you and Tribune7 were not so fixated on Joe and posting your BS, I would probably have made only a couple of posts today.
You have repeatedly and emphatically asserted that Joe absolutely knew the guy was a child rapist and that Joe was actively protecting Sandusky. I’m not talking about negligent inaction and moral cowardice, but actually using his position and power to keep a lid on Sandusky’s activities.
To this date, there is no evidence of that. On the once situation we know of where Joe had the opportunity to cover it up, he reported it to his superiors, who declined to investigate. Now if you can prove that Joe KNEW ahead of time that if he kept this ‘in-house’ that nothing would be done, then you got a case.
Until you do have something beyond that Joe was a moral coward trying to save his own butt (and could care less about Sandusky), you have speculation. In fact you repeated point out how self-absorbed and tunnel visioned Joe is. That in itself hints that Joe wouldn’t have walked out on a limb to actively protect Sandusky, but rather was just too much of a moral coward to confront it.