Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(More Generational Strife?) Retirement Wars
American Spectator ^ | 11.10.11 | David N. Bass

Posted on 11/10/2011 4:21:38 AM PST by Publius804

Will Baby Boomers be the last generation to enjoy the modern concept of a leisure-filled retirement? It's a worthy question to ponder in light of a new Pew Research Center report showing a growing wealth gap between young and old in the United States.

Using government data over the last 25 years, Pew found that households headed by those over 65 have made "dramatic gains" in economic well-being, while those headed by younger adults have fallen steadily behind.

In 2009, elderly households possessed 42 percent more median net worth than their same-age counterparts had in 1984. Young adults veered in the opposite direction: Households headed by those under the age of 35 had 68 percent less wealth in 2009 than those in their same age range had in 1984.

Put simply, the age-based wealth gap was 10:1 in 1984. A quarter-century later, it's 47:1.

It's obvious why older Americans typically have a higher net worth -- extra years of earning -- but the rising gap illustrates a growing problem, one worsened by the Great Recession: Many Americans in their golden years are enjoying a retirement that, most likely, will be extinct by the time today's younger workers reach their 60s.

That reality is setting the stage for a generational war over retirement, and a large part of the equation is Social Security. The political fault lines on the issue already are real.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: artificialdivisions; babyboomers; genx; geny; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Silentgypsy; Graybeard58

We exchange tips on agility with our walkers....


41 posted on 11/10/2011 7:16:52 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Obama Voters: Jose Baez wants YOU for his next jury pool.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

Sorry
Meant nursing home.
(If they’re still around after 2014)


42 posted on 11/10/2011 7:34:18 AM PST by hans56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
That means very, very few of those households "headed by those over 65" are headed by Boomers.

How dare you confuse the prejudiced with facts. Yesterday some idiot was blaming boomers for letting communists get a "foothold" in the universities.

43 posted on 11/10/2011 7:38:57 AM PST by Stentor ("All cults of personality start out as high drama and end up as low comedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hans56
I'm probably making an appointment with Jim Beam and Smith & Wesson before that happens . Amazing how many people have an accident cleaning their weapons.
44 posted on 11/10/2011 8:05:04 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]




Click the Pic

Don't Let the FReepathon DragOn!

Donate Monthly
Sponsors will fire up $10 for each New Monthly Donor

Many thanks to JoeProBono for the Cyclops dragon graphic

45 posted on 11/10/2011 8:10:04 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius804

“Will Baby Boomers be the last generation to enjoy the modern concept of a leisure-filled retirement?”

They’s also be the first....My grandparents never even considered retirement and I don’t recall it ever being a topic of discussion until my parents started talking about it.


46 posted on 11/10/2011 8:33:33 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

“In 2009, elderly households possessed 42 percent more median net worth than their same-age counterparts had in 1984.”

The dam evil wall street!


47 posted on 11/10/2011 8:34:22 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

Good to hear! But you are not the norm.

All the data I have seen shows that most retired people spend a lot at first, then in a few years spending goes down to below what they were paying out (in total) during their earlier years.

They have most disposable cash, but less month to month outlay.


48 posted on 11/10/2011 10:00:50 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy; ErnBatavia; dalereed
I gather you two are buddies.

ErnBatavia is a boomer. I, having been born on June 29, 1945, am a bit too old to be one but we both like getting those S.S. checks every month, so you kids (assuming you are young yet) keep on working and keep those checks coming to us.

DaleReed, the other member I've pinged, has been sucking up those S.S. checks longer that we have so he's ahead of us. We are all a part of the "Greedy Old Bastards" club, here at F.R.

49 posted on 11/10/2011 2:56:14 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country but Herman Cain loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
I do occasionally button up my shirt wrong but my wife usually checks me before I leave the house. Sometimes I do it intentionally, just to see if she's paying attention. We've been married since we were children and I still snuggle up to her on her side of the bed, on cold nights.

(I have too, that's where all the covers are)

Did you hear about the couple who had been married for 70 years? They were sitting in their rockers one evening and he turned to her and said, "I'm so proud of you dear". She turned to him and said, "That's OK, I'm tired of you too".

50 posted on 11/10/2011 3:04:21 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country but Herman Cain loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; ErnBatavia

Sorry, darlin’. I’m older’n you. My SS check amounts to $175/mo. I’m bankrupting the country in my own teeny-tiny way lol!
More power to you and thank you for leaving our country better than you found it!


51 posted on 11/10/2011 3:07:42 PM PST by Silentgypsy (If this creature is not stopped it could make its way to Novosibirsk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

You’re a hoot, Graybeard58!


52 posted on 11/10/2011 3:12:38 PM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“The problem is that the “conservative base” prefers to cuddle with the Republican Party, and I know of few (if any) young’uns who trust the Republican Party, especially after the Party’s behavior of the past decade. Shucks, I myself don’t trust the Republican Party after Bush and a Republican Congress went on a spending orgy!”

Perfect time to recall that it was a GOP controlled Congress and Dubya the idiot who passed Medicare Part D aka “free pills for granny paid for by the younger workers.” Most of the old folks around here are all about small government till you threaten to cut THEIR free pill gravy train.


53 posted on 11/10/2011 5:01:51 PM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

“Too bad, so sad for the “youts”. They had their chance when Bush proposed private accounts.”

ROTFLMAO! Nice try there but you conveniently forget several things. First the bill failed due to the fact that the GOP controlled Congress was getting pounded into submission by AARP and the old folks organizations. If the young are blameworthy its not being as politically organized as their grandparents and thus weren’t able to help Bush overcome the geezer pressure. Second, the “youts” were already screwed even before SS reforms came up the pike. Google Medicare Part D. It came to pass in 03. It gives free pills to granny. It will cost the young in this country trillions for just the upcoming decade! Have a nice day.


54 posted on 11/10/2011 5:09:22 PM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Careful... nowadays you might find some of the youth willing to deliver a bit of the ol’ ultraviolence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWLByMshYIU


55 posted on 11/10/2011 5:25:17 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Most of the old folks around here are all about small government till you threaten to cut THEIR free pill gravy train.

Ninety-nine percent of conservatives are about small, limited government until it comes time to cut their favorite program or stop issuing them checks.

56 posted on 11/10/2011 9:12:20 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
If the young are blameworthy its not being as politically organized as their grandparents and thus weren’t able to help Bush overcome the geezer pressure.

Poor babies. It's not like the geezers were never young once too. ;-)

57 posted on 11/11/2011 2:41:06 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

They were. They voted in such stellar politicians as LBJ who gave this country the esteemed legacy of Medicare and Medicaid which are going to bankrupt this country.


58 posted on 11/11/2011 4:53:38 AM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke

Baby boomers also voted in Reagan. Waitin’ now for the youths to step up and redeem themselves after falling for hope and change.


59 posted on 11/11/2011 5:05:40 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

The Boomer’s then had a large role in voting in Dubya who was such an exceptionally bad President that he ensured Obama’s election and turned off much of the youth from the GOP.

http://www.shu.edu/academics/scholarship/scholarship-detail.cfm?customel_datapageid_298601=355005

“The strong youth vote for Obama in 2008 was thus both pro-Obama and anti-Bush in nature. The huge age gap in 2008 suggests a split of the electorate along generational lines and the long-term consequences of the age gap appear to overwhelmingly favor the Democratic Party. George W. Bush’s unpopular and divisive presidency helped to make the youngest generation of American voters increasingly Democratic in their vote preference.”


60 posted on 11/11/2011 5:44:28 AM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson