Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
I don't have a problem with the government collecting fees from people who not only don't have an objection to paying 'em but have actively lobbied to give it to them.

To me, it's their money...and if they want to give it to the government and trust it to spend the funds appropriately, well that's their business.

19 posted on 11/09/2011 3:53:23 PM PST by Reese Hamm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Reese Hamm

Well, that presumes that the government can be trusted to spend only what they collect. The problem is that government agencies, once up, are very difficult to put an end to. And their primary concern seems to be to pay themselves more and more and to expand more and more, and let the taxpayers make up the difference.

Maybe that isn’t the case with these deals. But I would prefer to have the associations collect the money and spend it, without involving the government.

The Agriculture Department certainly has a very poor record. They crush small family farms so they can favor the large factory farms that are big political donors. They run insane programs like ethanol in gasoline, which does nothing to save energy but wrecks small engines and starves people in the third world. Once something like the ethanol program goes into effect, it seems impossible to reverse, no matter who the voters elect into office.

Maybe this is different, but I still don’t trust it.


21 posted on 11/09/2011 4:01:00 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson