Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama administration proposes 15 cent Christmas tree tax
The Hill ^

Posted on 11/09/2011 6:48:15 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Obama administration proposes 15 cent Christmas tree tax By Alicia M. Cohn - 11/09/11 09:17 AM ET

The Obama administration is proposing a new tax on Christmas trees to fund a board promoting the holiday trees.

The Christmas Tree Promotion Board would be funded by a new 15 cent per tree tax on large-scale producers of Christmas trees. A group of Christmas tree producers and importers worried about the skyrocketing use of artificial trees proposed the new board.

Under the proposal from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the board would seek to revitalize the marketing and image of fresh-cut Christmas trees, which have been overwhelmed in recent years by sales of artificial trees. The Christmas Tree Checkoff Task Force, the group of producers and importers who suggested the board, said the market share of artificial trees increased 655 percent from 1965 to 2008.

According to the agency, the new board is designed to be an "industry-funded promotion, research, and information program for fresh cut Christmas trees." Board members would be nominated from within the industry.

Past marketing efforts have resulted in an uptick in fresh tree sales, but such "voluntary marketing program[s] suffer from a lack of funding," according to the agency.

"Producers and importers that domestically produce or import less than 500 Christmas trees annually would be exempt from the assessment," according to the proposal, which is listed in the Nov. 8 Federal Register. Small-scale producers, along with organic producers, would have to submit an exception request to the board.

The proposed tax is authorized under the 1996 Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act that authorizes the agency "to establish agricultural commodity research and promotion orders."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho; christmas; christmastree; christmastreetax; mymuslimfaith; obama; tax; waronchristmas; waronchristmas2011
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: OB1kNOb

“Jizya tax on non-muslimes.”

-

Spot on.


41 posted on 11/09/2011 7:09:02 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

“One cannot,by “executive order” impose a tax,can one?”

Oh, you’re referring to that quaint, flawed document called the Constitution? We don’t use that anymore.


42 posted on 11/09/2011 7:09:10 AM PST by brownsfan (Aldous Huxley and Mike Judge were right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: albionin

Will the tax be levied on “holiday trees” or “
Christmas trees”

If on the politically correct “holday trees’ then the industry and public can avoid it by labeling them Christmas trees.


43 posted on 11/09/2011 7:12:32 AM PST by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Who knew those evil Christmas Tree Growers were part of the 1%.

Taxing suggestions:
-Christmas wrapping paper & bows
-Candy Cane Tax
-Tax the evil strings of white lights people use to decorate their homes
-Tax the Baby Jesus in the manger scenes


44 posted on 11/09/2011 7:14:09 AM PST by moovova (Report my sarcastic, fear-mongering, hate-filled lies to www.AttackWatch.com by clicking HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

That’s “Christmas Wishing Tree”


45 posted on 11/09/2011 7:19:43 AM PST by Mr. K (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Well the USDA and Federal government have such a stellar record keeping the small family farmer in business why would we object? /sarc

It would seem the USDA is in direct conflict with the First Amendment and are interfering with the Christian religion.

What would the president say if the USDA imposed a tax on Ramadan Maggots or Ramadan beheading swords or mo-ham-mud approved toilet paper pre-crapped upon with satanic verses from the Koran?

Fellow Conservatives, every day we are losing the war against an overreaching and blatantly unconstitutional government and still we fail to head the words of Thomas Jefferson. What a bunch of wimps we have become. We are now jokes just like the Euro-Wimps.

46 posted on 11/09/2011 7:20:03 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They need to impost a 15 cent tax on Buggy Whips too- to promote their use, since people are increasingly moving towards them newfangled automobile thingamajiggers, consarn it~!


47 posted on 11/09/2011 7:21:56 AM PST by Mr. K (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
Promoting Christmas trees will be a skewed ECO agenda promoting a Stick with a used
gum wrapper for a star. You know, recycling and all.

I doubt this will be about traditional trees and if it is, head fake.

I like the fact the Zero is meddling with an American tradition.

48 posted on 11/09/2011 7:22:10 AM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Once again the economic retard in chief thinks you can help the Christmas tree industry by increasing the price 15%. That is an insult to retards in general.


49 posted on 11/09/2011 7:23:00 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Charging a tax on something to fund a marketing campaign to sell more of them is just strange. I thought one reason for high cigarette taxes was to make them harder to buy, to discourage smoking. Why would it be the opposite for Christmas trees?

I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I have to admit, this looks like an unprovoked slam on Christmas.


50 posted on 11/09/2011 7:23:43 AM PST by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Did Hussein only demand that people making $250,000 pay the extra 15 cents?

Because that was the promise.

51 posted on 11/09/2011 7:25:45 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
-- Apparently, congress voted to give up its own authority. I will never understand why they do this kind of thing (super-committee on my mind). --

Aversion to accountability. Congress shifts authority every chance it gets. Vote the bums out.

52 posted on 11/09/2011 7:28:19 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I had to check the URL because I was certain this was an “Onion” piece.


53 posted on 11/09/2011 7:28:53 AM PST by Altariel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: married21

I wonder when obama is going to propose a tax on muslim prayer rugs.


54 posted on 11/09/2011 7:29:15 AM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Anyone find a link on the USDA web site for this stupidity?

I have searched for the topic and recent news but have come up with zip, zero, nada.

If you can find a link we would all appreciate it.


55 posted on 11/09/2011 7:29:48 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sevinufnine
Only reason we use fresh trees is because we own a couple hundred acres of forest land up against Nat’l Forest and chop our own every year. If Zero finds out....will I have to pay 15 cents to the gov’t for my tree?

No. If Zero finds out you could be fined and jailed for clear cutting without a permit. Whether they are on your land or not, those are not YOUR trees.

All your trees are belonging to us!

56 posted on 11/09/2011 7:30:08 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals vote like clowns walking thru a minefield, oblivious to the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

1. Taxing a religious symbol violates the “free exercise” clause of the first amendment.

2. Federal promotion of commerce in a religious symbol violates the “establishment” clause of the first amendment.


57 posted on 11/09/2011 7:34:07 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Leftists have long striven to eliminate non-Islam religion, in particular Christian ones. Now apparently this tax is to help promote a Christian holiday icon.

Frankly most people where to find a Christmas tree at Christmas.


58 posted on 11/09/2011 7:34:17 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Fun for women ages 21 - 35)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Well I still cannot find a link on the USDA web site but I did find this little nugget which will assuage all our fears about popcorn.

WASHINGTON, Nov. 8, 2011 – Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack appointed two members to serve on the Popcorn Board. Representatives will serve a three-year term of office beginning Jan. 1, 2012 and ending Dec. 31, 2014.

The Secretary reappointed Mark E. Schleisman of Lake City, Iowa and a new member, Richard Duty of Denver, Colo., to the Popcorn Board. The five-member board is composed of eligible popcorn processors who distribute over four million pounds of popcorn annually.WASHINGTON, Nov. 8, 2011 – Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack appointed two members to serve on the Popcorn Board. Representatives will serve a three-year term of office beginning Jan. 1, 2012 and ending Dec. 31, 2014.

The Secretary reappointed Mark E. Schleisman of Lake City, Iowa and a new member, Richard Duty of Denver, Colo., to the Popcorn Board. The five-member board is composed of eligible popcorn processors who distribute over four million pounds of popcorn annually.”

59 posted on 11/09/2011 7:35:18 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How is this not a separation of church and state issue?


60 posted on 11/09/2011 7:35:24 AM PST by School of Rational Thought (Fun for women ages 21 - 35)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson