Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

Without trying to seem like a complete Pollyanna, how can dark pools exist without the knowledge and concurrence of the SEC (not the college athletic league)?


3 posted on 11/09/2011 5:17:14 AM PST by Pecos (O.K., joke's over. Time to bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Pecos

There lies the problem, I think.


4 posted on 11/09/2011 5:18:44 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pecos

Dark pools are not necessarily illegal or against SEC regulations, if that’s what you mean. There are regulations in place, but the loopholes and loose definitions provide a legal cover for those trading in the dark pools.

Now, there probably are some trades that are illegal (or at least immoral), but a dark pool is not necessarily illegal. They are just concealed from the public. It is that concealment that leads many to say they should all be made illegal so that the public is aware of all trades.

When the mega-banks and firms are caught investing their client’s funds (like Corzine’s), that is not a dark pool but an illegal investment and should absolutely be prosecuted.

That said, the SEC is worthless when it comes to prosecuting the mega-banks for flagrantly illegal activity.


5 posted on 11/09/2011 5:43:25 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Karl Denninger has jumped the shark. Do not visit his blog.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson