I have been looking and looking for any proof of a 2nd agreement. Politico is the only source of that.
As for Politico’s 2nd woman, they based her story on one phone call, but haven’t been able to get a hold of her since.
NRA did not confirm 2 settlements.
Thank you for the reply. I too have been looking and can find zero substantiation of any “2nd” employment termination agreement, harassment settlement, or anything of that nature.
As some others have said, it seems to me as though there are 2 women involved: Bialek and Kraushaar, both of whom, as we all know, have highly suspect histories, as do their RAT lawyers.
The Politico reporter slipped and referred to the 2nd woman as "Sharon in Chicago".
When asked about this, Bialek wouldn't deny it and her attorney changed the subject.
That lawyer Bennett was on FOX a few minutes ago and the screen said FOX News Alert.
What did he say?
FYI on the second claim issue:
I can still find only 1, not 2, just 1. The claims of “two” appears to be false rumors, hearsay, or simple B.S. unsubstantiated claims to further smear Cain.
Someone can sure correct me if I’m wrong, but if I’m not, then correct others because “two” is the mindset right now hurts the positive psyche for Cain - 2 is much different than only 1 non-sexual gesture that an overly-sensitive woman says made her feel “uncomfortable”.
See the belows snip from last Saturday’s CBS article:
[snip] “Cain left the association June 30, 1999, according to the NRA. Under that timeline, Cain would have been gone when the settlement was reached—and may well have been gone when she filed the complaint.
Cain has insisted he only knew of one complaint, and says he knew of no legal settlements—only what he calls a severance agreement with one woman. This timeline could well bolster his claims.
When Cain ran to represent Georgia in the Senate four years later, he told his advisers there was one complaint against him at the Restaurant Association, and that it was “baseless.” One former staffer on the Senate campaign told CBS News that he and other advisers in the campaign knew about that complaint and believed it was meritless, but thought it could crop up in possible opposition research.”