Replies

The good news is the percent of women who do this for a living is very small. I think most women would be ashamed to admit they were that easy and loose. It follows that the women who do this are greedy whores—IMHO.

It is the easiest thing in the world to do once a woman decides to play the system. I was an Army lieutenant Colonel Division Chief supervising 79 military and civil servant employees.

I was accused of age, sex and gender discimination by a civil servant. She was angry that I gave her a poor performance evaluation and did not get a $500 bonus.

At that time she was in charge of a very high profile and complicated project. We had to brief a 2 star general weekly. She was never prepared. Finally, I took over the briefing and was doing her project work for her.

I counseled her twice during this period. This amounted to telling her where she was going wrong and how to fix it. Instead of following my advice she chose to get angry and convince herself that I was the problem. Her performance continued to deteriorate. I should also mention that the woman had a history of playing the race card before she came to my Division.

Also that she had worked for me before at lower non-supervisory grade. She did well in that job and I gave her a comensurate rating. When my job was converted to a civilian position I was transferred to a different job. The guy who took my job promoted her. He was subsequently moved out because he was not doing well as a Division Chief. I was asked to temporarily retake the job until another civilian Division Chief could be found.

So now Mary (pseudonym) is a supervisor and fails. Her performance evaluation reflects same. She initiates EEO complaint. The young woman sent to interview me from EEO comes in to my office and demands I respond to Mary’s allegations. It is really not an interview. It is hostile from the start. She wasn’t asking questions. She was accusing. After a few moments I stopped responding. She continued to accuse. I continued to say nothing. Finally she realized I wasn’t saying anything and said I had to answer her questions. I said “you may go”. She insisted I had to answer her questions. I told her to either leave my office or I would leave.

I knew her civilian boss. Called her and told her what transpired. Never saw the little chippie again, but Mary’s case moved inexoribly along. Took two years before it finally got to arbitration. I had moved on to a new assignment. Witnesses like my boss had long since gone to new assignments. My old boss had to flown back from Germany.

Two things worked in my favor. First I had supervised Mary before and had given her glowing evaluations. Secondly, I never counsel anyone—especially a female—without my own witness.

Upshot: She could not prove any age, gender or race discrimination. In fact, the record showed just the opposite. But, the government decided to settle to get rid of the woman. The settlement included her signing a pledge to retire immediately and to never sue the government on this issue again. In return she got the $500 bonus.

Like Cain I refused to sign the settlement. The government either changed my evaluation or had someone write a new one to facilitate Mary getting the bonus. All illegal as hell.

If I were to run for office and some one wanted to smear me in the future the ingredients are there. Ultimately the smear would be proven to be what it was. But damage to me would have been inflicted. Defending the false charge diverts me from my campaign strategy. The people who pompously state that “where there’s smaoke there’s fire” would condemn me despite the facts of the case and so on.

Sorry to be so verbose. My intent was to explain how sleezebags and their lawyers destroy otherwise good people. I thought the detail I provided would help you understand how it works.