If the people in MS or any other state wnat to re-do this I’m fine with it. In principle I think voters would be better served - and life - if the vote was not “when does life begin” but with the assumption that life begins at conception, which it obviously does, and then offered a vote about protecting life.
I may be misunderstanding the measure in which case I”ll read it again tomorrow because tooth pain is interfering with my brain right now.
Jack up the hood and put another car under it, while you’re busy repainting the body work?
There is no escape with quibbles like this either.
You’re going to then have to get your “assumption” in to the works. No escape, somebody has to vote. Given that stark buff naked reality, I’d sooner it be the larger body of people than the little cadre of judges that can get “assumptions” in. Things are more stable that way.