I am sure that they have it in testimony but Joe is not part of the indictment and what McQueary told Joe is irrlevant to this case prosecution of Sandusky, Curley and Schultz.
What McQueary told his father is also irrelevant to the prosecution of Sandusky, Curley and Schultz, yet we are told that specifically.
As I said, we are told about every conversation from every point of view, except what McQueary said that he told Paterno. It's not necessary to prosecute Sandusky, Curley and Schultz. It is necessary if you want to protect Paterno's image. And it's the one thing that's missing. I read a document twice. Once for what's in it, and once for what it's missing. Of the entire chain of links of all conversations, just that one link is missing.
And we're told plenty that isn't necessary for the prosecution. Sometimes what you're not told is . . . telling.