Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton: Let presidents serve three terms
Politico ^

Posted on 11/08/2011 6:54:43 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Bill Clinton: Let presidents serve three terms

By: Tim Mak November 8, 2011 08:48 AM EST

Three times could be a charm - but not for him.

Former president Bill Clinton said Tuesday that presidents should be able to run for a third term so long as they take off some time after their second term.

“I’ve always though that should be the rule,” he said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. “I think as a practical matter, you couldn’t apply this to anyone who has already served, but going forward I personally believe that should be the rule.”

Clinton made the remark in the context of a question posed by Morning Joe co-host Joe Scarborough, who said that many wished that Clinton could run again.

“Shouldn’t a president be able to take two terms, take time off and run again? Shouldn’t Americans have that choice?” asked Scarborough. He cited former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who led his country during World War II and then again in the 1950s, as an example.

The two-term limit for the presidency is mandated by the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which was ratified after Franklin D. Roosevelt won four consecutive terms in the 1930s and 1940s.

Earlier in the morning, Clinton said that he does not spend time thinking about whether the country would be better off under the leadership of his wife, Hillary Clinton.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho2012; powergrab; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: al_c
Post of the day!!!!

Wow. Thank you. But the day's still young. I will save my speech for later. Just in case.

21 posted on 11/08/2011 7:05:23 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: =8 mrrabbit 8=

Well, I do agree that Clinton would want to run again. And IF he could go up against Barry, he, indeed, would win the Dem nom.

I don’t think the Reps running are a bad lot. I look at it like....at the very worst, we get Romney. AT THE WORST. And, I do believe he is a smart, decent guy. Who knows? He could really grow into a fantastic Pres....Reagan had some bumps before he “saw the light”.

That said...I would rather have a “real” Conservative. Who knows what will happen with Cain? I don’t count him out yet.


22 posted on 11/08/2011 7:06:06 AM PST by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No. Sometimes I think two is too many. Maybe we need to amend the Constitution to allow a single six year term.


23 posted on 11/08/2011 7:06:25 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“I’ve always though that should be the rule,” he said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe.

So Bubba's big on rules, huh? Except for that whole "I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth" rule.

24 posted on 11/08/2011 7:07:07 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Repeal the two term amendment, but, allow a shall remain in office vote every two years.


25 posted on 11/08/2011 7:08:54 AM PST by depressed in 06 ( Where is the 1984 Apple Super Bowl ad when we need it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Typical Clintonian logic - or lack thereof.

And folks still think this sleezeball is intelligent.


26 posted on 11/08/2011 7:08:58 AM PST by Da Coyote (Liberalism - when you absolutely, positively have no ability to produce wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’m on board!

I think going to three 1 year terms or three 2 year terms would be a vast improvement.


27 posted on 11/08/2011 7:09:14 AM PST by Iron Munro (One Trillion seconds = 31,709 years. One Trillion dollars = 3 Months of Obama Spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

If I had just taken a sip of my coffee, you’d be seeing a bill for a new monitor. Dang, that was funny.


28 posted on 11/08/2011 7:10:00 AM PST by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

FUBC!


29 posted on 11/08/2011 7:10:34 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Thank God the Presidency is term limited.


30 posted on 11/08/2011 7:15:27 AM PST by GOPJ ( Democrats are the only reason to vote for Republicans.... Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pigsley

At the end of Clinton’s 2nd term we had a balanced budget.

Who ever thought I would wish for a return to Clinton.

But he was FORCED into that by Newt Gingrich, so that is why I would love to see a Cain/Gingrich ticket


31 posted on 11/08/2011 7:15:57 AM PST by Mr. K (The enemy of my enemy is my candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

So many interns so little time...


32 posted on 11/08/2011 7:17:24 AM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Lately, I’m think a one-term limit would be better.

The United States was not designed to have an imperial president, but rather be a republic controlled by a messy, ugly, legislature.

Only because the federal government is too powerful, does the POTUS matter so much.


33 posted on 11/08/2011 7:21:34 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why do we want a rapist, crook, liar and thief to serve a 3rd term Bill?


34 posted on 11/08/2011 7:27:05 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’d go the other way. Limit them to six years.


35 posted on 11/08/2011 7:30:53 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Madoff screwed the rich. Bernanke screwed us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ah NO!


36 posted on 11/08/2011 7:31:44 AM PST by mk2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
I think going to three 1 year terms or three 2 year terms would be a vast improvement.

With that system the incumbent would be in campaign mode from day one.

We need to encourage less campaigning, not more.

37 posted on 11/08/2011 7:34:00 AM PST by upchuck (Rerun: Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Bill would actually be a vast improvement from Obama.


38 posted on 11/08/2011 7:35:18 AM PST by Lazamataz (I guess some Occupiers are more 99% than other Occupiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Imagine 12 years of klintoon! or 12 years of hitlery!!

Would be better to have POTUS for one term, maybe even 6 years. Or better one term for 4 years with the opening to run again after being out of office at least one term.

As it is now we have a working President for maybe 3 years and a year running for re-election (present Indo-kenyan socialist muslim excepted on all aspects).


39 posted on 11/08/2011 7:35:46 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Funny he did not seem to feel that way as George W’s expiration date was looming...


40 posted on 11/08/2011 7:36:23 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson