So, let's get this straight. A woman who produces two sworn affidavits by concurrent witnesses to her claim is not credible, nor are the assertions make by three other women, because they have no evidence, BUT this account IS credible with no more evidence than the word of this individual.
This account is credible to you Cainiacs even though several other people who claimed to be all knowing about who attended the tea-party meeting have publicly stated that they didn't remember seeing this woman (who they also say anyone would certainly remember) in their efforts to destroy the woman's credibility after she had claimed to have attended the meeting.
Are you Cainiacs so blinded by your love of Cain that you are unable to see the irony in all of your attacks?
- She is a liar because she couldn't have been there, because someone who was there asserted that they didn't see her and they would have remembered anyone who looked like her.
- She is a liar because she was there and she hugged Cain
- First you complained that the original Politico article didn't have a face behind the story, that it was anonymous and not credible for that reason.
- You now have a name and a face to accompany the charges and she's not credible because "she's a skank ho" or because "she's a money grubber," or because she filed for bankruptcy in the past, or because--whatever excuse you can find to attack her.
- You complained that the original article wasn't credible because it lacked any specifics
- This woman has provided specifics--in graphic detail--including two sworn affidavits attesting to the fact that she told people about Cain's alleged attempt at groping, but she is still not credible.
One can only come to the conclusion that you Cainiacs don't find her credible for the sole reason that she is accusing Herman Cain, your anointed candidate.
You now have the accusations of four separate women claiming essentially the exact same treatment by Cain on four separate occasions. If this was occurring against Obama or Bill Clinton, you would already have him charged, convicted, and strung up by his short and curlies.
Really? How rational is that???