Posted on 11/07/2011 9:52:20 PM PST by Lazlo in PA
Going through the story that was laid out in the press conference today by Sharon Bialek, Levin has found a few problems that necessitate more information. He said earlier in the show that he was unable to get Gloria Allred to book her client on his show, so hes basically left with just questions that need answers. One such question is why, after Cain had already upgraded Bialeks hotel room and then took her out to eat at an Italian restaurant would Cain then ask Bialek why she was meeting with him. Another question would be why he took her to the NRA to show her around if she had already worked there before? And theres more.
Levin makes clear hes not suggesting one way or the other the potential outcome of this story, who is guilty and who isnt, but that he just believes her story doesnt quite make sense and thus he would like to ask her a few questions.
Audio at link.
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
I almost forgot:
“It’s the liberal media... It’s the Perry campaign... It’s the Democrat machine...”
See posts #101 and #102.
See posts #101 and #102.
See posts #101 and #102.
Get your bias out of the way:
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/16002149/investigator-herman-cain-innocent-of-sexual-advances
So the software has a “95 percent success rate”... I’ll gladly concede that when it comes to aggressive lying, Cain is comfortably within the top five percent.
They should test their machine on his claim that he never said he was against auditing the Fed, or that he never called audit supporters ignorant, or that he’s “prolife” with “no exceptions” but government shouldn’t make that decision, or that he didn’t remember any details of Karen Kraushaar’s claims, or that he didn’t remember any financial settlement, or that he’d traced the media leak to the Perry campaign.
You’re so full of hate you can’t think straight.
Brief interview answers. I’d like to see them in context. What questions was he answering?
Thing is, I’ve actually said the exact opposit of what I meant from time to time. Fortunately, I’m able to clarify. And like I say about Rush Limbaugh, if everything he says for three hours a day is recorded for years, one should be able to find hundreds of misstatements, assuming he is not superhuman.
IOW, I’m interested in what people say, but I am more interested in what they meant when they said it. That takes follow up and qualifying questions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.