They remain primarily non-violent, ineffective, and increasingly annoying?
Or do they start getting more and more violent and perform a remake of 1968?
Either way it is good for the Republicans.
Back in the 60's the protests were led by kids who had received a proper education. These kids are functionally illiterate. They're only good for smoking pot, stealing each others' stuff, giving each other STD's, and committing random acts of violence.
Call me when the train full of gold and guns pulls up to some kid named Lenin and launches a real revolution.
“So what’s the plan?”
I think Soros/Obama/various-commie-leaders wanted violence and mayhem. Their model is the 1960’s (that worked so well didn’t it). But there are two problems; these kids don’t really have a clue why they are there. If they were properly trained and indoctrinated they would all cry with the same voice “Workers of the World Unite!!!” or some such twaddle. The second problem, why they will never succeed is that the rest of the country has wised up to see them for what they are. This is another commie-revolution-wannabe which will fail.
They should just stick to the slow brainwashing of the masses through TV, Hollyweird, etc. It has actually worked.....