I’ve seen Wilson say that he commented to Politico when asked but that he was not the source of the original story. Frankly, I have trouble believing him.
In fact Greta posted a few days ago that he was the source. If this is the case, I suspect he acted on his own rather than in concert with the Perry folks.
Oh. Is that the Perry defense? It was a top staffer, not Perry himself?
Well, Perrybots, stop trying to sell the “oh it was Romney” argument at the same time you’re trying to distance Perry from the Perry staffers who are actually guilty.
You’ve been caught red handed. It’s team Perry, not another campaign.
Why does Wilson differentiate between being the original source and being the second or third guy in.
What's the difference?
—I suspect he acted on his own rather than in concert with the Perry folks.—
I’m with you. It is not necessary to blame Perry for this, and not really productive. The story is no longer the accusations anyway. Just as Michael Medved said that it is all probably baloney, but Cain’s response proves he should not be president (A position I strongly diagree with and consider Medved a Romneybot), the REAL story is the MSM jumping the shark on this story.
I swear I could go to MSNBC and claim that Cain made homosexual advances to me and they’d give me a live on-air interview.
Hmmmm. Wonder if there’s any bucks in that...