Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truthfreedom

Actually, I’m confused as to how you know the woman Wilson spoke about at the restaurant is woman #3. Women #3 spoke with a reporter, and gave her story. So I don’t think we got her story from Wilson.

I believe Wilson was talking about one of the 1st two women, not the 3rd woman. He was talking about the politico story, and he mentions that “the fact she left”, which sounds like one of the two women who had termination agreements. The 3rd woman didn’t leave, she just ended up in a job where she didn’t interact with Cain.

NOTE: ALL MY REFERENCES are based SOLELY on the statements made, and I’m not endorsing them or giving them any weight, except as regards to identifying which woman Wilson was speaking about. Wilson was sleezy to talk about the restaurant thing the way he did, and I’m not saying he was in any way truthful in what he said.

ALL I am saying is that Wilson was unlikely to be the original source of the story (he denied he was the source in a politico article, and that’s not how confidentiality works in the news business), and neither Cain nor Block considered him as the source.

If you have a link to an original source that clears up the Wilson/#3 link, I would certainly appreciate it.


31 posted on 11/07/2011 11:40:34 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

If you could give me links, I’d appreciate it.

I’d like to read other sources.


32 posted on 11/08/2011 12:51:21 AM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Wilson declined to say specifically what Cain said or did to the woman, but that the CEO’s actions made other individuals at the table uneasy.”

Once again, it’s an unnamed woman, completely unspecified actions, “gestures” or remarks, and apparently they were so horrible that no charges were ever filed, no complaint made, and nobody else has ever come forward until now…even though it supposedly happened more than a decade ago.

This article says: “no complaint made”

Women 1 and 2 are the ones who DID make a complaint.

Therefore, this was woman #3.

There might be some link other than this article that clears this up. I’m not saying I’m the expert.

What I think I see are 4 women

Woman 1, Woman 2 - these women got money from the Restaurant Association. Cain was no longer at the Restaurant Association when these women got the money. We don’t know anything about why these women got this money. We do know it has something to do with Cain and allegations of sexual harassment. This was the original Politico story, and people don’t know how Politico got this story. What woman 1 and woman 2 have to say is relevant, as at least the restaurant association took them seriously enough to pay them some money. It doesn’t mean their charges are true, or are indicative of the nature of the charges, but until they answer, this will continue to hang over Cain’s head, to some degree.

Woman 3 - It appears that Perry’s Wilson is the only person talking about Woman 3. Perry’s Wilson tells a story of a dinner in a restaurant where Perry’s Wilson said Cain behaved badly. I think that’s all we know about Woman 3. Perry’s Wilson could easily just be making up Woman 3.

Woman 4 - was the woman from earlier today with Allred.

I could be wrong on any of those details, and would be interested in links to clarify especially about Woman #3 - Restaurant Woman. Who else but Perry’s Wilson has been talking about Woman #3?


33 posted on 11/08/2011 1:09:54 AM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson