Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

‘Bolen’s most persistent smear is his description of me as “de-licensed.” He is fully aware that “de-licensed” means having one’s license taken away by regulatory authorities and that I merely retired in 1993. I have committed no misconduct and retired in good standing, but Bolen likes to pretend that I have done something wrong. The Pennsylvania Board of Medicine now classifies my license as “Active – Retired,” which means that I can prescribe for myself and my immediate family. Since I no longer see patients, there is no reason to maintain a broader license.’

Give it up. He would be in bad standing then and it would be noted.


184 posted on 11/11/2011 9:48:25 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel

That is a false statement. Barratz surrendered his license to get a court action dropped.


186 posted on 11/12/2011 11:28:56 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson